Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Write of way


I am surprised that you have received only one letter on the subject of changing the ICE membership structure and I wonder if members realise what a significant change is being proposed.

However, George Gray has set out the factors which should concern us all (Letters NCE 5 May). I am not sure that I agree with his swipe at 'ICE bureaucrats' because it is the senior members of the institution who appear to have lost the plot.

The stification for these proposed changes has not been adequately explained and a lengthy period of discussion and debate is required before any implementation can take place. Certainly the proposed date of late May for a ballot is quite unacceptable and one is left with the impression that this matter is being rushed through before anyone notices.

Compare this process with the long-standing (about 30 years) neglect of the education and training of technicians, a much more important issue.

This surely has a much higher priority than admitting into membership people with no knowledge of civil engineering at a time when we have all agreed that the profession needs a higher public profile.

Jim Haude (F), 17 Breamwater Gardens, Ham, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 7SF

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.