Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Huge clear up remains months after Haiti quake

Rubble is everywhere in the capital: cracked slabs, broken-up cinder blocks, half-destroyed buildings that still spill bricks and pulverised concrete on the sidewalks.

Some places look as though they were flipped upside down, or are sinking to the ground, or listing precariouslyto one side.

By some estimates, the quake left about 25 million cubic metres of debris in Port-au-Prince, more than seven times the amount of concrete used to build the Hoover Dam.

So far, only about 2% has been cleared, which means the city looks pretty much as it did a month after the 12 January quake.

Government officials and outside aid groups say rubble removal is the priority before Haiti can rebuild. The reasons why so little has been cleared are complex and frustrating.

Heavy equipment has to be shipped in by sea. Dump trucks have difficulty navigating narrow and mountainous dirt roads.

An abysmal property records system makes it hard for the government to determine who owns a dilapidated property. And there are few sites on which to dump the rubble, which often contains human remains.

No single person in the Haitian government has been declared in charge of clearing the rubble.

This means foreign non-governmental organisations have taken on the rubble removal task themselves, oftenfighting for a small pool of available money and contracts. The work is done piecemeal, with little co-ordination.

“There’s not a master plan,” said country director for the UN Development Programme Eric Overvest. “After the earthquake, the first priority was clearing the roads. That was the easiest part.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.