Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Wind turbine produces just 27p of electricity in three weeks


THE FUTURE of microgeneration was thrown into question this week after one engineeing consultant calculated that his newly installed wind turbine would take 2,457 years to pay for itself.

A row is ongoing between London based engineering consultant Large & Associates and wind turbine installer Sundog after the consultant generated just 27p worth of electricity in the first three weeks of operating the new turbine at its Woolwich Common premises.

Sundog installed the £11,500 Proven Energy WTR2500 wind turbine early last month.

Disgruntled Large & Associates director John Large said: 'We went through a great deal of bureaucracy to install this unit - planning, grant applications, deals with the electricity supply company - and, the result for all of this hufng?

- very little puff.

'To date, over three weeks and including the storm two weeks ago, we have generated just over 27p of electricity.

'There are several sets of performance characteristics here - the turbine has to be matched to its wind performance, that [matched] to its generator, then [matched] to its power control unit to stop it stalling at low wind velocities, and then to the grid connect inverter to protect the grid - the result seems to be a real mishmash of transfer functions.' roven Energy business advisor Peter Tindt said that the expected loss of energy between the turbine and the National Grid should be no more than 10%. The company is now investigating the wind speeds powering the turbine in January.

Tidnt added 'typically the turbine is vastly better than this; it loves wind and is extremely robust. It is either badly located or badly installed.' Sundog declined to comment.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.