Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Why is London still being paved with gold?

Letters

Adding up the rail investment, as per your article 'City rail needs £8bn more' (NCE, 25 May) I felt concerned at the rest of the country being marginalised.

We are reminded on the national news every day of problems with infrastructure in the South East (water, roads, housing, rail. . . ), but it seems more money is being ploughed into the area than ever. Why?

Why is the government not spending more on actively encouraging people to move out of the South East?

The sum of the investment needed for rail alone is almost £22bn, according to the article. Ask yourself what is the opportunity cost? Could we get a high-speed rail link up to Manchester via the Midlands?

Could we widen the M1 and M6?

Could we subsidise regeneration in other cities, or subsidise rents, to encourage businesses to move north? In Birmingham we can not even get enough money to put another rail line through New Street station.

While I am jealous of this level of money being spent on London alone, I am more concerned at the national strategy of encouraging more people to base themselves in the South East. Has the government thought it through enough?

I do not think we are going down the right track.

Richard Annett, rannett@constructionplus. net

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.