Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


Closer cooperation between piling rig manufacturers and users is needed says Expanded Piling director Martin Blower.

Is the UK ground engineering industry getting a fair deal from piling rig suppliers? The simple answer is no.

Given the current healthy and sustained construction workload, specialised plant is in short supply. And for rig manufacturers it is a sellers' market, with contractors having to accept what is on offer – one-size-fits-all, off-the-shelf products. The days of customer focus seem to have vanished.

This take it or leave it approach is complicated by a welcome, if controversial, move to amalgamate European design codes for piling and drill rigs into one standard, which could force contractors into using plant not best suited for the task.

Project start dates could be delayed, with programme delivery and outturn costs threatened. Action is needed now by both sides to prevent this.

The UK market for drill rigs represents only 5% of the annual world manufactured output, and the construction industry is busy everywhere. Manufacturers, it seems, are not really committed to customer focus.

And we now face local UK legislative differences in rig design that are over and above general worldwide market requirements. All this is bound to make a client with a project feeling slightly uneasy.

There is a move to amalgamate the two European Committee for Standardisation design safety codes for piling (BS EN996) and drill rigs (BS EN791). Both sides see the need to improve these standards, but for different reasons.

Manufacturers are keen to remove technical anomalies between the standards, such as bearing pressures, stability angles and factors of safety. Rig users are keen to have a strong voice in the preparation of the new standard, something they did not have previously.

When these two standards were drafted, most piling rigs were mechanically operated. Now, nearly all are hydraulic dedicated machines. This new common standard is crucial because, to sell a machine into Europe, manufacturers have to comply with it to get a European Conformity (CE) mark.

A key area of friction between manufacturers and users working in the UK market is the additional need to comply with local health and safety regulations, for example, the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, and the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998. Most manufacturers want only to comply with the CE regulations.

Beyond this, the accepted level of provision of operator instruction and assessment is inadequate. Generally there is reluctance on the manufacturers' part to take ownership for these matters. Would this be acceptable if you were buying a new car? Why then is it acceptable when purchasing a £500,000 rig?

Individual user companies have exerted pressure to obtain better solutions. But would it not be more constructive if the industry recognised these problems and responded wholeheartedly in a unified way without waiting for a successful prosecution to force us to improve?
Why should we be interested in this? Despite it being such a buoyant market, there remains a limited number of premier league rig manufacturers.

Rigs are now sold first come, first served and off the shelf, with extended periods between order and delivery.

Projects are increasingly complex with new developments proposed on brownfield, often previously piled, sites. Operations such as pile extraction, concrete coring and deep obstruction removal are increasingly common. With such complexity, rigs are required to work closer to their limits. Add to this compliance with UK safety legislation and it is essential that all stakeholders recognise the likely scarcity of suitable rigs.

Unless these issues of supply, compliance and project complexity are adequately factored in by all of us, delays and cost rises seem inevitable.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs