Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

White of reply

Letters

Your profile of Ben Hamilton Baillie (NCE 28 July) discusses the option of removing white lines in densely urban and pedestrian shared road surfaces, presently limited to 30mph, and making absence of the white line a default to the lower speed limit of 20mph.

I concur that in such areas, a 20mph limit is probably appropriate and may result in fewer accidents. But I feel that the motorist should be informed of the 20mph limit by either, or both, pillar signs and signs painted on the road surface.

It has also been suggested that the idea be applied to inter-urban roads. Here I become concerned.

We know that on a single carriageway 60mph is the maximum. If white lines are omitted, then the default might be 50mph. Equally if we are already in a 50mph zone, then it is envisaged that omission of the white lines automatically reduces the limit to 40mph.

But, in the absence of repeaters, how would the motorist know the limit in the fi rst place- The use of signage from the beginning would eliminate doubt. Confusion is a recipe for accidents and any system of defaults without repeaters seems to me a certain recipe for confusion.

EJM Hepper (F), Uplands, 61 Queens Road, Alton, Hants, GU34 1JG

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.