Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What is the Matter with Geotechnical Engineering?

GEODIARY

9 February, University of Nottingham This contentious question was first addressed by John Atkinson (right), professor of soil mechanics at City University, London. 'It is said: two thirds of ground engineering is done by non-geotechnical engineers; the largest source of claims and disputes is in the ground; too much of the time of good geotechnical engineers is spent in court and on disputes. If these claims are true then something is the matter, ' he argued.

His opinion has already generated a lively debate within the industry and academic communities, and Atkinson will continue this at the next East Midlands Geotechnical Group meeting.

Atkinson will consider the nature of geotechnical 'failures' in a wide sense, the causes of problems in the ground, the competence of geotechnical engineers and their education and training and some of the drivers and constraints on change.

For more details please contact the EMGG secretary Ed Faragher on 01509 282304 or visit www. lboro. ac. uk/emgg

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.