Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

What a shower!

Letters

Like almost everyone else, I have followed the path of this latest disaster in our building industry at Wembley with a distinct feeling of dejà vu.

Much is being made of the perceived shortcomings of the contractors and all the fault is being placed on their shoulders. One item that did catch my attention though was that the showers are too low to accommodate a 2m tall sports person. This would seem to be a design fault, poor supervision by the design team - or both.

Dare I suggest that some information on the role of the designers and the client in this sorry mess should be forthcoming. For example, what about the design programmes (a critical item for any project) with all the design freeze dates. Were they met?

By this, I do not mean the first issue date but the date that the contractor actually had a detail of what he built.

All the facts should be laid bare so that proper judgements can be made based on the whole picture, valid lessons can be learned and blame apportioned fairly.

Only if this is done will we have reason to hope that the whole performance will not be repeated over and over again on the forthcoming Olympic projects.

James R Knight (F), 4 Jacobean Road, Lincoln, LN6 3RB

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.