Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Wearing a support

Letters

Despite the low turnout there is no denying that the results of the merger consultation (NCE 18/25 August) show more in support than against. But what was the question again?

I remember sitting in a meeting at Great George Street listening to Tom Foulkes explain that the question being asked was whether the membership was in favour of the ICE talking to the Mechanicals. After all, this was a consultation exercise, not a vote - the vote would come later.

But NCE tells it different: '51% of ICE replies were in favour of merging the two institutions'.

I am in favour of the talks but at the moment I'm against a merger. It's clear that the results won't work for both questions.

So why has the question changed- Has ICE changed the question to suit the answer that they wanted or is this simply a case of 'reporting licence'- I sincerely believe that the latter is the case.

As far as I understand it, the results of the consultation mean we have invited them in for coffee but we are far from getting into bed.

Phil Welton (M) philip. welton@ntlworld. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.