Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Wear it's at

Letters

We all know the fatigue properties of rail steel ( N C E 13 September) and from this we know the lifespan of the rails. If rails are not changed at the right time then we expect them to break.

There are railway systems in other countries less affluent than the UK which change their rails based on fatigue. When are we going to start thinking of running railways based on technical knowhow, whether it is to do with rail breakages or signal failures?

According to the latest figures, there are two rail breakages a day - two too many. Are we waiting for a real disaster, as usual, before we eventually do something?

Michael Arshad (F), Lourquen, France, 114563.3343@compus erve. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.