Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Water tight case


I think it is important to clarify the terms used in the debate on the use of sprinklers in tunnels (NCE 7 December).

Sprinklers are the automatic fire suppression systems that we are all used to in buildings and do not use vast volumes of water. There is a strong recommendation by PIARC against their installation in tunnels.

In practice such systems have been shown to kill people and there is a famous case in Japan of a vapour explosion killing fire-fighters after the fire had been extinguished.

The Australian approach on the other hand has been to use a deluge system. This is a high volume system used only after the tunnel has been evacuated and only by manual operation.

The Swedish solution used on the Stockholm ring road, which was established after a very long and thorough research project, is a deluge foam water system. The foam concentrate is added at each valve station. The definitive paper is by Magnus Arvidson.

David Caiden (F)

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.