Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Water industry spending set to increase after 2010

Suppliers to the water industry are anticipating a 15% rise in workload in the next five-year spending period, starting in 2010.

The draft determination on water prices from industry regulator Ofwat would, if adopted, commit the ten water-only plcs in England and Wales to spending £19.6bn in AMP 5, substantially up from the £15.7bn they are spending in the current AMP4.

“In general the supply chain is feeling pretty positive,” said president of MWH Europe Africa and chair of the ICE’s water panel David Nickols.

Suppliers’ welcome for the draft determination is in contrast to water company complaints when the draft determination was released because Ofwat said there was to be no increase in the prices charged to customers.

“The regulator has been very aggressive and operational expenditure is where the ability not to have price increases comes from.”

David Nickols, MWH

But the efficiencies that will keep prices down are expected by the regulator to come from the operations budget. “The regulator has been very aggressive and it [operational expenditure] is where the ability not to have price increases comes from,” Nickols said.

EC Harris director Terry Povall said suppliers would be affected by the reduced capital targets, however. “What is going to interest suppliers on the capital side is where the cuts are going to come from. The companies initially asked for £27bn of capital spending in their draft business plans (dropping to £22.4bn in the final plans). Will the cuts be in scope or efficiencies? And say 50% is efficiencies, where is that coming from?”

Most companies are “digesting” the information from Ofwat, but Thames Water has indicated where it might have to make cuts.

“It’s early days, but initial indications suggest the draft determination may not allow us to deliver what our customers want in the future. For example, this means we won’t be able to reduce leakage at all over the next five years,” said Thames’ chief executive David Owens.

“The regulator’s draft determination has also cut by almost a third the funds available to tackle sewer flooding at people’s homes,” he added.

Optimistic for the future

But Nickols said he was optimistic for the future. “We are in the middle of the biggest dip in workload ever but in three-to-six months it is going to be a good time to be a water engineer,” he said.

Companies are less inclined to hang on to water staff as there is currently a surplus of engineering skill and engineers are easy to hire. “But in 18 months there is likely to be a huge shortage of resources,” said Nickols.

Capital spending comparisons AMP4:AMP5

Water plcAMP 5 draft
determination £bn
Plc business
plans £bn
AMP 4 capital
spending £bn
Dwr Cymru1.081.31.15
Severn Trent2.252.62.2
South West0.640.750.76
United Utilities3.383.72.5

Readers' comments (1)

  • How ironic - at a time when Ofwat are looking for significant cuts by the water companies from operating expenditure the regulator itself has just reported a 13% increase in spend in its annual operating budget! Who is going to be looking at Ofwat's business plans to deliver operational efficiencies?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.