Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Water industry has lost 29,000 jobs in five years

Up to 29,000 water industry jobs have been axed in the past five years, according to new research by water trade association British Water.

Companies in the water industry supply chain have cut staff numbers by an average of 32.3% over the five-year AMP4 period and into the first year of AMP5, British Water has found. It has calculated that this means up to 29,000 jobs have been lost, from a water industry supply chain believed to employ around 89,000 people in 2004.

With a potential 29,000 jobs “in flux”, said British Water UK director Paul Mullord, there is a risk that companies are wasting money on making redundancies only to recruit for the same roles two years later.

A further risk is that companies could struggle to recruit skilled employees when work picks up again, if those made redundant choose to emigrate or move to different sectors.

ICE water panel chair David Nickols said: “Due to the slowdown of capital investment that occurs during each price review − compounded in 2009 by credit shortages − many experienced people have left the sector. This loss of talent is not being addressed and represents a risk to the future of the water industry.”

“Due to the slowdown of capital investment that occurs during each price review − compounded in 2009 by credit shortages −many experienced people have left the sector”

ICE water panel chair David Nickols

British Water is surveying its members − which include water industry consultants, contractors and suppliers − for details of their highest and lowest numbers of staff employed on work for UK water companies between the beginning of AMP4 in April 2005 and the present. So far 16 out of 158 member firms have responded to the survey.

The highest staff numbers were shown in 2008, with the lowest numbers in 2010. The average time period between the highest and lowest numbers was 2.25 years.

Mullord said the interim numbers are clear evidence of the “extreme peaks and troughs” of the regulatory cycle due to the dearth of work during the transitional time between AMP periods.

The figures reflect the fact that the AMP period changeover has coincided with economic downturn, said Nickols. “Coming at the same time as similar reviews in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and occurring during the recession, [Ofwat’s price review] has created a perfect storm for the industry,” he said.

Mullord said industry regulator Ofwat should look again at alternative regulatory systems such as staggered price reviews. Water UK communications director Barrie Clarke agreed that the current five-year cycles cause industry turbulence. “The whole sector is interested in a much smoother way of investing across the five year period,” he said.

British Water is continuing to collect data from members. It will publish the final figures from its survey later this summer.

Readers' comments (3)

  • Mike Potts

    There may not be the loss of skills as widely predicted as in the current employment market it is nigh on impossible to use transferrable skills into other roles as employers can pick and choose those who have the exact match. As I know from the many applications I've made out of the water sector.

    In hindsight I should have definitely emigrated however. Hopefully soon I and the 20 odd thousand other water skilled staff will get back into the cycle in the UK. I only hope something is FINALLY done to sort out the peaks and troughs I dread to think of being unemployed again for 11 months in 5 years time.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would disagree - as an engineer you have many highly transferable skills, with quality assurance, health and safety awareness, good project management skills, technical competence to name but a few of the most general ones. I for one am considering transferring my skills into teaching up to A level Physics and Maths, and feel that I will have a very good start in my new career. I have also considered moving into Health & Safety or general project management, and have not considered sales (but it could be the perfect option for someone else).

    This is the crying shame - engineers are generally highly talented and adaptable people, and those that leave the industry will be a huge loss.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There's a world of opportunity for engineers, pick and choose your roles yourself;

    www.engineeryourcareer.com

    coming soon!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.