Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Water feature

Letters

KR Rollinson (Letters 13 July) asks why Thames Water doesn't abstract non-tidal water from the Thames above Teddington Weir rather than seeking to abstract water from the tidal reaches and desalinating.

Thames Water and its predecessors have been abstracting above Teddington for over 100 years. Indeed some 80% of London water is derived from the non-tidal reaches of the rivers Thames and Lea, the remainder being derived from wells, mainly in the south east.

For environmental reasons, a statutory minimum flow must be maintained over Teddington Weir, hence the amount that can be abstracted above Teddington is limited.

Mr Rollinson suggests that the aquifer might be replenished with the same quantity of tidal water that would otherwise be desalinated by pumping it into the wells.

Since well water within the aquifer is derived from pure rainwater falling over the North Downs requiring minimal treatment, I wonder if Mr Rollinson would choose to drink the water derived from his proposed new source?

Peter Shephard (M), 35 Hazell Way, Stoke Poges, Slough, SL2 4DD

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.