Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Visible risible

Letters

I refer to the letter from Philip Jones (NCE 10 October) which offers no evidence that limiting visibility can control traffic speed.

It appears that the recommendations contained in the guidelines are based on inadequate research and are contrary to the Traffic Advisory Leaflet 2/96. This suggests a mean crossing speed of 1218mph for a 75mm flat top hump - ie the maximum having regard to the need to maintain clearance to the underneath of vehicles.

Design Bulletin 32 (second edition) states 'Restricted visibility in the absence of other precautions cannot be considered a safe means of reducing vehicle speed. For safety drivers must be able to see a potential hazard in time to slow down.'

Mr Jones then argues that the 12m stopping distance is more than enough. Indeed, as 9m is the distance travelled in the thinking time it is no surprise that once you have decided to stop it does not take 12m.

In my view these proposals are dangerous and the whole design guide should be withdrawn immediately.

Derek Bissell, Transport in Planning, 107 Worchester Lane, Four Oaks, Sutton Coldfield, B75 5NL

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.