Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Video | Japanese method to stabilise railway

Bridge farm ground works

Network Rail has released time-lapse footage of a 12-week project to stabilise half a mile of subsiding embankment beneath the Chiltern main line in Buckinghamshire.

Source: Network Rail

Cost-saving Japanese method to stabilise railway - Bridge Farm near Aylesbury

The dips in the tracks, which could eventually cause subsidence, was repaired using a Japanese Giken silent piling machine, to drive 865 six metre-long steel sheet piles deep into the earth to form rows either side of the railway at bridge Farm near Aylesbury.

These piles formed barriers behind which engineers packed 27,000 tonnes of stone.

Network Rail’s London North Western route works delivery programme manager Mark Evans said: “By using this innovative Japanese piling method we got the job done quicker and cheaper than traditional kit would have allowed.

“The Giken machine grips the neighbouring steel sheet pile and silently uses it to lever in the next one, and so on. It’s simple, safe and saves taxpayers’ cash - exactly how we like it.”


Readers' comments (2)

  • Overall principles of the stabilisation seem obvious. Was not the Taywood Pilemaster 1960's the same pile driving method??

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It is Alan, this isn't a new method at all. At Fussey Piling we bought one of these types of machine in 2001, and currently operate 3 of them. There are dozens working flat out around the country, often on Network Rail projects.

    It's also not true to say that it is quicker with this method - using a vibratory hammer with a leader rig would have been substantially quicker. Silent piling machines are favourable because of the lack of vibration, not the speed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.