Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Video evidence

Letters

The tragic accident at Grayrigg has highlighted the on-going need for adequate surveillance of vulnerable points components without recourse to endless track walking.

I understand that a track inspection vehicle fitted with video equipment had passed the scene some two days prior to the accident, but, inevitably, the huge volume of data recorded was awaiting processing.

For the past 10 years London Underground has been developing and using its AVI video system. This, combined with a computer database, enables the recipient of the video recordings to access designated priority features almost instantly.

Video surveillance has always been an attractive prospect, but as anyone who has ever studied output tapes will know analysis is difficult, time-consuming and boring. LU recognised this, hence its successful prioritised access feature.

Paul Leech (M), PaulLeechNB9@aol. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.