Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Venetian blind


Bob West, in his letter (NCE 1 May), is mistaken in assuming that the Venice barrier flood defence gates are similar to the bottom hinged flap gates evaluated during the feasibility study carried out by Rendel, Palmer and Tritton for the Thames Barrier.

The Venice gates are buoyant. Their mass and buoyancy resist the differential head between the Adriatic and the Venice Lagoon during a flood surge. This was not a feasible solution for the Thames Barrier because early elevation of the gates during the tidal cycle would not be possible.

Also, low upriver level during a flood surge would not result in the required buoyancy to resist the downriver surge.

Apart from the identification of both types of gate as bottom hinged flap gates, they are fundamentally different. The Venice gates were devised by an Italian Engineer, Ludovico Solinas, who has not received sufficient credit for his invention.

Professor Jack Lewin (F), 2 Beechrow, Ham Common, Richmond, Surrey, TW10 5HE

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.