Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Vanishing point


Have I overlooked something, or is the public and the infrastructure still there as I look out the office window? Is this same public still demanding a better public infrastructure service than 10 or 20 years ago?

There are still people providing this service. But the level of debate would make you think that the public had vanished overnight, depriving the municipal engineer of a market. This is not the case.

The debate boils down to whether the people providing these services are strictly 'municipal engineers'. As they are still 'engineering' and we are arriving at the same, or better, outcome as years gone by why should they not be classed as such? Planners, environmental health professionals and others also have a valid contribution to make.

But in multi-service departments there can only be one leader and it is up to individuals to equip themselves for this role. There are ample opportunities out there; it is up to individuals to pursue them.

Young municipal engineers don't despair - you are in a growth industry with a declining workforce, this is your time to come to the fore.

Jim Valentine CEng FICE St Johns House Stanley Perthshire PH14ND

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.