Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Value for money is ‘crucial’ and PFI must now deliver for tax payers

PFI funding has not delivered “best possible value” for taxpayers in the past but this must change, Treasury Select Committee chairman Andrew Tyrie said today.

Tyrie welcomed the Government’s response, published today, to his committee’s report on PFI. But he argued that it did not fully address the issue that national accounting is an incentive to use PFI because it excludes it from Public Sector Net Debt.

“We must avoid using PFI solely as a means of placing Government finance off-balance sheet,” he said. “Value for money is crucial.”

Tyrie said PFI might be suitable for projects when the risk associated with future demand and usage of an asset can be transferred or when the benefits of private sector management outweigh the higher capital cost.

He argued that it was “right” to explore other mechanisms of private sector funding of projects laid out in the National Infrastructure Plan 2011, as the banks are currently less willing to lend on these.

But he warned: “The Government must be cautious about taking on further contingent liabilities or providing guarantees that could lay additional costs at the door of future taxpayers.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.