Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Utility injustice


Like many others, I enjoyed Mike Chrimes' article outlining the work of our Victorian predecessors in the utility industry (NCE 7 December 2006).

What incensed me was his insinuation that utilities today are responsible for much traffic disruption.

Firstly, if he were to check with NJUG, he would find that contrary to the belief of politicians and the media, the utilities are responsible for less than 10% of the disruption caused to trafc.

Secondly, it has to be remembered that highways are the vehicle for the delivery of the utility services on which we all depend. They are not just for cars.

Thirdly, the public and media are urging us to do more to maintain our infrastructure, not less!

The engineering profession should recognise that many of its members work for utilities and should support our efforts, not repeat the uninformed and inaccurate criticisms of the media!

Andy Neve, technical director, A.Neve@ portsmouthwater. co. uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.