Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Unsafe working practices blamed for train collision

Unsafe working practices in Network Rail’s track renewal work were among the factors that led to a passenger train being struck by a rail last year, a report into the incident has said.

A Cross Country train struck a piece of rail that was being moved as part of maintenance work at Washwood Heath in Birmingham on 6 March 2010, said the report that was published this week.

The leading vehicle of the train struck the rail, which was being moved as part of track relaying work being carried out on another line. The rail was being lifted by a road rail vehicle.

The investigation by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) found that the accident, which damaged the front and side of the train and slightly injured the driver, was caused by a combination of factors. These included unsafe working practices in the maintenance work, which did not comply with industry rules or Network Rail’s procedures.

The investigation also found that the supervisor in charge of the track relaying work was not adequately managed and was not challenged over his unsafe method of work.

Among other factors that contributed to the incident was that the original work plan may have been unrealistic, such as a push to get the work done by a 31 March deadline.

The report found that since May 2007 trains have struck tools or equipment associated with engineering works on 23 occasions.

RAIB has made four recommendations to Network Rail following the investigation. These include ensuring that safety documentation for staff is checked by someone other than its author, and that management at Saltley infrastructure maintenance delivery unit − which was responsible for the work − is improved.

Network Rail must also review rules governing work being undertaken by on-track plant, such as the road rail vehicle, when it is adjacent to lines that are open to trains. This includes reviewing how often checks for compliance with Network Rail’s maintenance rules are undertaken.

Readers' comments (4)

  • Barry Walton

    Will anyone check the Engish? (practices - noun, plural), (practises - verb, present). The past perfect of 'lead' is 'led'.

    B Walton (F)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • As you will be aware as a reader of this website, or of the magazine, the authors of NCE are either partially illiterate or so badly managed / edited that incorrect English is the norm, rather than the exception. I am often ashamed to be a member of a so-called learned Institution, whose official publications are badly spelt and full of simple grammatical errors.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I couldn't agree more. (American) Microsoft is creeping into the language - I always thought that "under way" consisted of two separate words, like "under stress" or "under sail", but perhaps I'm an old fogey!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Thanks for your comments and apologies for the poor grammar. This has now been corrected, however, NCE house style allows "underway" as a single word.

  • Given how important Health & Safety is it always surprises me how many photographs of drilling and piling rigs without adequate guarding make the engineering press (NCE is guilty of this!). It doesn't set the greatest of examples really.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.