Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

UK's first carbon capture and storage project under threat

Speculation was building this week over whether plans for the UK’s first commercial scale carbon capture and storage (CCS) plant at Longannet coal-fired power station in Fife, Scotland, would go ahead.

It was widely thought that energy firm ScottishPower, which runs the 2.GW Longannet station, may pull out of the CCS scheme after years of negotiations with the government. Decc and ScottishPower denied that the scheme was stopping and insisted negotiations were ongoing.

ScottishPower is currently the only remaining bidder in the Department of Energy and Climate Change (Decc) CCS competition, which will award up £1bn of funding to develop the technology at a commercial scale. Previous contestants energy firms Centrica and Eon pulled out of the running in 2009 and 2010 respectively.

Industry insiders speculated that there was a gap between what Decc and ScottishPower were willing to commit to the scheme to develop technology to capture and permanently store carbon emissions.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Longannet PS 2.4MW? I think it should be 2.4GW??? or is the 2.4MW referring to a 1/1000 scale CCS Plant???

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It should be 2.4GW - story has now been corrected

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.