Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Arup and CIHT reports chart pedestrian future

Green Canopy Walk

The 20th century belonged to the car, but two new reports from Arup and the Chartered Institute of Highways and Transportation say the 21st century should belong to the pedestrian. 

If Friedrich Nietzsche, Steve Jobs, and Charles Dickens were to meet at a celestial pub they would have at least one thing in common to talk about – all avid walkers they would like extol the benefits of travelling by foot.

As it goes for genius, so it goes for the mortals.

Arup and the Chartered Institute of Highway and Transportation (CIHT) have issued reports that point to benefits for pedestrians, as long as a city’s infrastructure is configured for walkers.

“Car culture is on the decline, at least in the Western world,” according to the report Cities Alive from Arup. ”Studies indicate that in North America, Japan, Australia and European countries we may have reached ‘peak car’ – the apex at which car ownership, licence ownership and the distance driven per vehicle level off, and then turn down.”

But cities are still often designed for car users, and that comes at a cost to health and wellbeing when people abandon journeys that could be taken on foot, says the report.

The CIHT report, A Transport Journey to a Healthier Life, notes that increased walking not only cuts obesity rates but also increases footfall for shop owners. 

It calls for Public Health England to assess policies from the Department for Transport to determine how transport strategy impacts on health. 

“At the very least they [public and private sectors] should assess the impacts on cycling or walking because HEAT (Health Economic Assessment Tool) developed by the World Health Organisation to provide an economic assessment of the physical health benefits of walking and cycling – already has credibility, and there are many practical examples of how to use it,” said the report.

There is no one option that can make all cities walkable. 

“No single measure, whether electronic road pricing, transit-oriented development or walkability, will be successful in achieving sustainable mobility in cities,” noted University of Hong Kong professor Becky PY Loo in Cities Alive. ”The transport system needs to be considered holistically.”

“A sustainable mobility strategy for mega cities will not be suitable for low-density cities with substantial suburban sprawl. The key ideas are to ensure synergy of walkability with other transport policies, allow local participation and ensure a system of good governance,” she added.

 

 

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is all very well designing an environment for the pedestrian, but we should be designing equally for the vehicle and the pedestrian and this is what the design standards lay down. However, if there is an incident between a pedestrian and vehicle, the immediate reaction is that the vehicle driver is to blame. How often do we see pedestrians attempting to cross a road, when if they walked a further 5 metres they would have had the benefit of a pedestrian crossing of footbridge? Are we to start constructing barriers along either side of a road to guide pedestrians to pedestrian crossings or footbridges? I doubt planners would agree to this and the outrage that would be generated by the Civil Liberties people would be deafening. Pedestrians and drivers must be educated to follow the rules of the road and this can only be done from an early age through Road Safety Education, starting in pre-school playgroups and throughout their lives, but what has happened over the past decade or more, is that as soon as there are financial restraints in local authority finance, the meagre Road Safety budget is cut or eliminated in favour of councillors pet projects, resulting in the number of professionally trained Road Safety Officers being greatly reduced and the work of road safety being put into the hands of untrained low paid or volunteer personnel. Road Safety is a necessary Lifeskill, and only when that is recognised by all, will the modern environment become really pedestrian friendly.
    D C Donald

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.