Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tunnelled vision

Letters

With regard to the report on the Holmesdale Tunnel (NCE 28 September), why on earth would anyone imagine that adding a fourth lane to a British motorway would make any difference to traffic flows.

The average British motorist never drives on the inside lane anyway.

If I were living in one of those blighted rural towns that had lost its bypass to spending cuts, I would be seething at the thought that someone in the Highways Agency could have approved spending £75M on widening a Nimby instigated cut and cover box on the top of a hill on the M25.

For that kind of money it could have eased the misery endured by far more people than those precious few using the M25.

To call it a tunnel is a bit of a joke. If you want to see a real busy tunnel in action go to either Antwerp or Rotterdam where longer structures under major rivers accommodate thousands of heavy trucks every day.

To make matters worse, the Holmsdale designers are even adding more 'tunnel' just to put in some new ventilation.

I would have thought that drilling a few holes in the roof would have been a bit simpler.

It worked for Brunel and all those other railway tunnel engineers.

Adrian Davis (M), Zoetermeer, the Netherlands

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.