Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tunnel vision?

I read the letter from Denis Stephens with a mixture of interest and frustration. The tunnel scheme past Stonehenge has finally been scrapped and, yes, it may have cost less than infrastructure for the Olympics.

As an improvement to the UK's motorway and trunk road network it was a vast expense and unjustifiable. One can always find something more expensive that the government is supporting to beat them with such as the Olympics, rail "privatisation", etc.

The solution is surely to close the road that divides the visitors centre and the stones together with a conventionally dualled A303 with some imaginative earthworks and landscaping that would achieve a considerable improvement.

I'm not a philistine to ancient history and architecture and I appreciate that the infrastructure serving the site needs improving but English Heritage needs to adopt a sense of realism. Visitors from all over the world travel to a site where the supporting experience is tatty and English Heritage has nothing to show for decades of entrenched position.

PETER FOX (AM), psffce@yahoo.co.uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.