Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Transport projects face deeper than expected cuts

Transport secretary Philip Hammond this week ordered project promoters to look hard at ways to slash costs as he warned that public spending cuts could be deeper than expected.

The Department for Transport has been asked by the government to draw up plans to cut its budget by up to 40%.

Hammond told the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show that departments that fail to make a good case for sustained investment will suffer most. Health and overseas aid spending will be ring-fenced, while defence and education face cuts of 10% to 20% (see p6).

“The non-protected departments will have to face reductions of 25% on average,” said Hammond. “But we’re not just going to take a sort of salami slice off every department. Departments are being asked to prepare not only a 25% case but also a 40% case.”

The Campaign for Better Transport (CBT) said Hammond’s announcement should serve as a wake-up call.

“The 40% announcement is about putting a rocket under departments to tell them government really is serious,” said CBT roads campaigner Richard George.

“It is time local authorities and government agencies started coming forward with much cheaper alternatives to traditional road and railway schemes,” he said. “I can understand why they are reluctant to put anything cheaper forward as it makes it look like the scheme is not that important.

“But this is not the age when a £100M bypass can be delivered.”

“This is not the age when a £100M bypass can be delivered.”

Richard George

Hammond admitted that he did not expect cuts in any department to reach the full 40% but that “some departments may see cuts a bit higher than 25%”.

In his own department he said the cuts would effectively halt new road building - but that big infrastructure projects that helped the economy would still be prioritised.

“There will certainly be less money available for major new road projects,” he said.

“We will have to focus first and foremost on maintaining the roads we have got.”

George agreed that continued maintenance funding was more important than building new.

CBT says that £7.6bn could be saved by axing or descoping new road schemes and postponing the development of the High Speed 2 rail link to the North.

By doing this it believes 20% to 25% cuts in the transport budget can be made without jeopardising Crossrail, London Underground’s upgrade programme or support for local buses. It also believes rail fares can be maintained at current levels or even cut, provided Network Rail delivers on its efficiency programme.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Of course the MPs have to get from Parliament to their flats (or even Home Counties constituencies) and back, so Crossrail and the LU upgrade are safe. Virtually none of the governing parties' MPs (except a few LibDems) live more than about 150-200 miles from London, so we will have no meaningful transport projects except those in the Home Counties / London. That's not a party political point, just a statement of fact. Perhaps the south-west, Wales and the north of England should join Scotland in seeking independence from London!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.