Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Transport funding gap grows even wider

New figures show transport spend in London is now close to triple the spend in the North of England and West Midlands.

New analysis of Treasury public spending figures by transport lobby and promotion group Passenger Transport Executive Group (PTEG) reveals that spending on transport in London has now risen to £802 per head.

This compares with spending of £286 per head for the West Midlands and the North of England combined.

The figures per region are: £248 per head for the North East, £333 for the North West, £272 for Yorkshire and Humberside, and £257 for the West Midlands.

The gap has widened considerably since the previous year’s figures with spend in London rising from £634 per head to £802 per head, whilst the spend in the West Midlands and North of England rose relatively modestly from £262 to £286 per head.

The disparity in public spending on transport between London and the regions is not matched for public spending as a whole, or for spending on education or health. It is also a relatively recent phenomenon rather than the historic norm, PTEG said.

PTEG chair Geoff Inskip said: “It’s not just London’s transport system that needs a shot in the arm. A greater level of transport investment in Britain’s major urban centres is needed to help bridge the North South divide.

“These funding gap figures validate what people can see with their own eyes − which is that in recent years transport spending in London has been in a different league when compared with the next tier of major cities.

“High Speed Two, and large scale expansion of tram networks like Manchester Metrolink, show that investment in public transport is far from confined to the capital – but we need to keep up the pace on investment of that scale if the funding gap isn’t to continue to grow in a divisive and disproportionate way.”

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.