Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Train delays compounded by overrunning engineering works

Misery for commuters waiting in sub-zero temperatures for train services delayed by snow and ice on Monday morning was made worse by over running maintenance work, NCE has learnt.

On the London to Brighton line, Southern rail services into London Victoria were cancelled at the height of the morning peak and First Capital Connect operated a restricted service with Thameslink trains running over an hour late.

A spokesman for Network Rail said: “We apologise for the disruption caused to passengers because of over running work in the Three Bridges area. Planned work to replace track overran by two hours until 4am on Monday morning despite already being scaled back to take the weather into consideration. As a result, snow and ice treatment trains were unable to fully treat the third rail which caused some delays to services. We are working 24 hours a day to treat ice and snow on the railway and will continue to work with train operators throughout this cold snap so as many services as possible are able to run.”

On arrival in London, onward journeys did not get much better for some commuters. Track replacement work over running at London Underground’s Neasden Depot in West London caused major disruption to Metropolitan Line services, bringing into question the rationale of continuing with programmes of major works at times of sustained snowfall and freezing temperatures.

A spokesman for London Underground said: “This work was continued because we have a massive programme of improvements to carry out. The delays to Metropolitan Line services were caused by work on installing new points over running, not by the cold weather. If we stopped work every time the temperature dropped we would never get the work done.”

Network Rail’s spokesman confirmed that track work is very rarely postponed because it is planned over a year in advance in many cases.

“Postponing work planned so far in advance would mean very bad news for our programme,” he said.

However, Network Rail’s work on the Brighton line was scaled back last weekend to reduce risk of a late reopening of the line, but this was not enough to prevent the tracks being handed back for services two hours late.

Heathrow engineers exonerated

Heathrow’s operations team responsible for looking after its runways and taxiways has emerged from this week’s cold weather exonerated from blame for flight disruptions and cancellations that saw thousands of travellers stranded at the airport.

As snow continued to fall throughout last weekend it became clear that it was individual airlines’ failure to get planes ready to take their allocated take-off slots that caused much of the delay. Problems with tugs used to push planes from their stands and a lack of plane deicing equipment – both the responsibility of airlines – were cited as main causes for planes failing to meet their take-off slots.

Heathrow’s main area of responsibility, the airport’s runways and taxiways were kept operational by the airport’s fleet of snow clearing equipment, but reduced visibility forced longer gaps between take-offs and landings to be imposed. After 400 flights were cancelled on the first day of disruption last Friday, the airport was operating a reduced service by the following Monday with one in 10 flights cancelled.

Readers' comments (1)

  • CHARLES ROBERTS

    Heathrow engineers exonerated?
    Perhaps NCE could tell us where civil engineers were involved in clearing the runways and taxiways? Were "engineers" operating the snow ploughs?
    But the operations team cannot be "exonerated" for the real cause of the delay; scheduling the number of flights per hour at the same runway capacity whether it is winter or summer and then wondering why, when snowfall or freezing fog reduces visibility, that all those flights cannot be handled safely each hour. Duh!
    Can NCE not write original articles that are fit for their professional readership, rather than regurgitating BAA press releases?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.