Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

The Lovins' spoonful

Letters

Your two articles quoting Amory Lovins, chief executive of the Rocky Mountain Institute (NCE last week) leave me unimpressed by any show of incisive intellect. Here are just a few examples:

Mr Lovins says there is a need to use 'wind, tidal, solar, geothermal and biomass' sources as alternatives to centralised thermal generation plants. Agreed, but he also states: 'It makes sense to put the power supply nearer to the demand.' Does Mr Lovins understand the geography of this country, in particular the locations of the 'renewables' areas in relation to population centres?

He also states that nuclear power is 'commercially unrealistic' and 'not economically viable' and would require 'subsidy from the public purse'. What else is the public purse intended for except the provision for the common good of essential services that are unattractive commercially?

Relying on the commercial free market for such provision has offered countless examples of costly and awkward failure.

Mr Lovins also refers to retrofitting property in the UK and states that this could achieve 60% energy savings and pay back in two to three years. This is a fine unsupported declaration of faith.

Utter twaddle - could do better.

George Kistruck (M rtd), George@kistruck. com]

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.