Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tests cast doubt on original WTC fire spec

News

FIRE TESTS on the floor truss design used on the World Trade Center's (WTC) twin towers have cast doubts on the original fireproofing specification.

They showed that the thickness of fire protection in the original design would have given only half the specified two hour fire resistance.

The tests were the last two of a series of four carried out by the US Department of Commerce's National Institute of Standards & Technology.

They recreated the type of fire test that could have been carried out on the WTC trusses in the late 1960s in accordance with the standards of the time, but of which there is no record.

One test was carried out with 19mm thick cementitious fire protection coating, equivalent to that found after the towers collapsed in 2001. The second used the thickness of 13mm specified by the towers' designer Leslie Robertson.

Both trusses were placed in a furnace which was to be heated to 1,200infinityC. They failed at around 1,000infinityC.

At the time the New York City building code was not mandatory for the WTC, but the towers were claimed to have complied with it. This code required two hours' fire resistance for the floors as determined by the ASTM E119 specification.

Last month's test in accordance with the 1968 edition of ASTM E119 was carried out on 5m lengths of truss coated with 13mm of fire protection. They showed the resulting fire rating was only one hour. The fire rating of the previous test with 19mm protection gave a much better two hour rating.

NIST spokesman Michael Newman said the tests did not explain what happened after the aircraft crashes on 11 September 2001 but gave a better understanding of the relationship between standard fire testing and performance in real fires.

'Earlier full scale tests in Canada suggest that E119 may need revision.

It seems that it is very difficult, especially on unusual buildings, to scale up the performance in standard fire tests to much

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.