Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Technical Note: Making the earth transparent – Using engineering geophysics to help manage uncertainty and reduce project cost

Rod Eddies, Fugro onshore geophysics manager for the Africa-Caspian-Europe region, and Ray Wood, executive vice-president, Fugro Consultants Inc. This paper was first published in GE’s November 2014 edition.

Introduction

Successful site characterisation is defined as deriving sufficient information to build a representative ground model. This is one where subsurface ground conditions and features have been identified and characterised by a combination of desk study, intrusive and geophysical approaches, with reasonable confidence.

Ideally, the ground model will capture all subsurface variability of interest to the development fully, with minimal cost and within the shortest timescale. However, economic and practical factors dictate that the ground model resulting from a conventional “boreholes only” ground investigation will inevitably be an under-sampled, smoothed representation of the ground.

In the specific context of foundation design, and as a result of the great variability in ground conditions and their behaviour, industry adopts reliability-based design methods calibrated to deliver safe designs at very low levels of failure.

Greater use of full-scale or semi-full scale foundation testing to failure or close to it, provides a site-specific calibration of the design method. Such calibrated design methods often lead to significant savings in foundation cost and, because of the investment made in understanding how the site truly behaves, these cheaper foundations are paradoxically safer. There is, however, little point in good quality foundation testing if variations in ground conditions have not been extremely well characterised for the site.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.