Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Technical experts excluded from illegal contracts inquiry


SCARBOROUGH BOROUGH Council last week rejected calls for legal and technical experts to sit on the internal working party investigating the unlawful award of consultancy contracts in Scarborough.

Local MP and civil engineer Lawrie Quinn criticised the council for appointing a working party of councillors with no experience of major infrastructure projects.

But the council defended its decision. 'Technical and legal advice can be pulled in if it is needed, ' said a council spokeswoman.

The council has set up its own investigation into the contract awards after an Audit Commission report revealed that £4.2M of consultancy contracts were awarded unlawfully to HighPoint Rendel between 1997 and 2000 (NCE 16/30 December 2004).

Local taxpayers are calling for an independent investigation into the matter. One, retired detective constable Stanley Dickinson, has written to North Yorkshire Police demanding a criminal investigation is carried out.

He also called for the immediate suspension of those involved.

Referring to the Audit Commission report he said: 'False documents were prepared to cover the council's failure to tender projects. We need to know why and how this happened'.

'The council has not disciplined those responsible. There are clearly members of the council who have been economical with the truth, ' he said.

'Those involved should be suspended and it is very strange that they have not been, ' he continued.

One of the projects let unlawfully was the controversial coastal defence scheme designed to protect the Scarborough headland.

Funding came from the Department for Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) but this could be withdrawn, depending on the findings of the working party.

'We will wait for the council's report before we consider and make comment on the legal position and whether it is lawful for payments to be made, ' said a DEFRA spokesman.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.