Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tech in a dim view

Letters

I refer to the letter Beeching Plan (NCE last week), commenting on statistics relating to technicians. In the mid 1960s, when the ICE ceased recognition of HNC and similar qualifications, the stated aim was to build up an industry with the ratio of 1:5, engineers: technicians.

Unfortunately, the perceived opinion at the time was that technicians were nothing but failed engineers. The number of entrants to the industry enrolling for degree courses increased and this in turn led to many more graduates who went along the route to becoming chartered engineers.

The technician route has deteriorated over time, as highlighted by the number of day release courses, and indeed colleges, which have ceased to exist.

If anything I would estimate that the ratio tends in the opposite direction and that in fact the technician is a dying breed, almost an extinct species.

Michael Grounsell (M), michael. grounsell@atkins global. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.