Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Oroville city sues dam management body

KG oroville repair 16066

US businesses and the city of Oroville are suing the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) for “decades of mismanagement” of the Oroville Dam.

The claimants allege the spillway failures at the dam last year were caused by “decades of mismanagement” and “intentional lack of maintenance”.

The complaint documents also allege there was an attitude of “patch and pray”, despite cracks appearing in the concrete shortly after construction, which were quickly deemed normal.

Lead lawyer Niall McCarthy of law firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy said: “Local businesses were hammered by the state’s recklessness. Their losses continue to grow. It is time to correct this injustice.”

In February last year 180,000 Californian residents were evacuated when an emergency spillway, a chute cut into the hillside designed to carry excess water flows from the dam, began to fail.

Oroville Dam’s main spillway had crumbled in the previous few days, leading to engineers shutting the water off and allowing water levels in the dam to rise.

Last week the Los Angeles Times reported that costs for repairing the Oroville Dam had risen to $870M (£611M), far higher than the £351M figure reported in October. 

In January, a report from the Independent Forensic Team investigating the crisis revealed that a graduate engineer with no previous experience had been given sole design responsibility for the Oroville Dam spillway.

The concrete chute had knowingly been built on weak rock and the report blamed “systematic failures” within the DWR.

A spokesperson for DWR said it could not comment on pending litigation.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.