Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Taxing talk


I understand that, in California, there has already been a substantial take up of biofuels, even though they are more costly than fossil fuels. Here we have a huge advantage over California, in that most of what we pay for diesel is tax.

If the government were serious about CO 2, then a tax regime which reduced the tax on biofuels so that the pump price was about the same as fossil fuel would get the ball rolling.

Every oil company would hurry to get biofuels on to the market. Every car maker would be racing to make cars that run efficiently on the biofuels.

Farmers, currently paid not to produce crops, could make real crops of maize or sunflower. Low cost African economies could do likewise. And we could have a worthwhile industry leading the world in biofuel vehicles.

And we would stop mining and wasting 4.5bn years of deposits in a couple of hundred years.

I know it can work. One of our buildings in Mauritius is being used to make ethanol from sugar cane, and they are already adding 20% of this to petrol. Why 20%? Because cars will run on this with no modification.

With just one approach we could eliminate 35% of our CO 2; and this could spread to the rest of the world.

Rollo Reid, uk

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.