Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Talk less and pay more


With regard to the ongoing issue of the skills shortage, I was enraged to find yet more time and money (NCE last week) is to be invested in a problem where the solution seems already apparent - just not accepted.

Engineering is probably the second most trained profession to medicine, but engineers are not rewarded as such for the risks and responsibilities we take on. We are, after all, looking after the public's lives as they go about their everyday living through the country's infrastructure.

Companies want competent graduates with good degrees.

Why are the justifications of increasing an engineer's pay so difficult?

Students would become more likely to choose to study engineering at universities, more universities would then seek accreditation from the Institution and then companies would compete to give the best experience and sponsorships in return for the best graduates.

The money currently being invested for further investigation into skills shortages could be better spent on providing the pay increases themselves.

Sarah Maytum (G) maytums@lineone. net

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.