Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Summing up an engineer

Letters

Mark Whitby (NCE 2 March) asks for a definition of engineering. It might be useful to take a leaf out of the mathematicians' book, and define the profession by what it isn't.

For example: 'Engineers apply knowledge to create the unnatural, not the natural, world. Or: 'They ensure nature is not red in tooth and claw.'

The argument being that while other people (and species) build things, they do not apply knowledge, and therefore, are not engineers.

Groups like mechanics are required to be creative on occasion. However, maintenance tasks would fall outside this definition, since maintenance usually centres on the dismantling and reassembly of equipment, which requires an empirical understanding of the task, but not creativity, and to a certain extent, knowledge.

Alex Perry (G), perrya@apci.com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.