Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

SuDS standard


I write with regard to the recent article 'The drain brain' by Aidan Millerick (NCE 21 June) and the subsequent letter by Martin Luker of Environment Agency, Thames Region (NCE last week).

First, the Environment Agency has an official policy to support and promote sustainable drainage systems (SuDS), which offer a measure of protection from flooding and pollution by new development.

The views expressed by Martin Luker were his own, and not those of the Agency.

Secondly, from a technical point of view Martin Luker's letter was a misrepresentation.

He states that 'sustainable drainage can never replace adequate and efficient pipework'. Aidan Millerick's article was well reasoned, outlining the benefits of SuDS, but made the point that they are not the answer to everything.

What SuDS do is to compensate for the adverse effects of additional surface water drainage from new development, up to greenfield runoff rates. If that is exceeded then there is no further beneficial effect, but the same applies at a greenfield site when it is saturated, and to pipes when they are full Martin Townsend, Environment Agency technical planning manager, Thames Region, chairman of national SuDS steering group, Kings Meadow House, Kings Meadow Rd, Reading, RG1 8DQ

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.