Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

SuDS guidance finally due out in July


LONG AWAITED guidance on the adoption of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) is expected in July, nine months later than originally promised, the Environment Agency confirmed this week.

Publication of the code of practice will at last enable engineers and developers to conform with the government's planning policy guidance and use SuDS in all new housing developments.

Drainage design engineers greeted the news with relief this week but cautioned that the guide was only a stepping stone to vital legislation to underpin the adoption of SuDS by local authorities.

'We have waited long enough for this guidance, ' said Aiden Millerick, managing director of drainage software company Microdrainage. 'Primary legislation is needed urgently as there's not going to be voluntary agreement [between the parties].'

SuDS allow rainwater to seep slowly into the ground rather than being directed into main sewers, which are increasingly overwhelmed during periods of intense rainfall. The new planning policy PPG25 demands that all new homes are equipped with SuDS.

However, their use has been limited by wrangling between local authorities and water companies over who is responsible for looking after them once installed (NCE 18 March).

The guidance is intended to give clear direction on the adoption of the infrastructure by local authorities. It is being prepared by a multi-party working group for the Environment Agency and was due for publication last November.

The House Builders Federation agreed that legislation would be needed to provide full clarity to adoption but said the new document remained essential to provide clear guidance on working relationships between the various parties involved.

A spokesman said the Federation has warned that the dispute over who should bear responsibility for SuDS had delayed introduction of the policy.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.