Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Stop this madness

Letters

NCE asks whether engineers should claw back the lead in bridge design. But should there be a wider debate on the role engineers in major construction projects?

The construction industry continues to have a rather poor reputation as a result of problems with large works; Wembley Stadium and the Scottish Parliament building being prime examples.

We should begin to ask whether major projects are becoming schemes where architects appear to be more interested in gaining a reputation for extreme design rather than providing something fit for purpose at a reasonable cost.

Wembley is primarily a football stadium, it can be used for other events - but football is the raison d'être. Spending almost a billion pounds on a football stadium seems madness. Should we not say so with a strong voice?

If we do not I shudder to think what the bill for the 2012 Olympics will be and how many grandiose follies will remain as monuments to wasted millions following the games.

Roy Foot, 32 Sutherland Avenue, Petts Wood, Orpington, Kent, BR5 1QZ

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.