Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Standards bearers


I write in response to the letters from Greg Riddle and Robin Duncan (NCE 4 November). Both complain about the education standards required for registration as a chartered engineer.

It is important to understand that the requirements for longer higher education reflect the time required for the wider project-based studies recommended since the 1979 Finniston report, and echoed by the demands of employers and clients on newly-graduated engineers.

They also derive in part from the well-documented steady decline in the mathematics and science skills of school-leavers holding apparently good A-levels.

The UK continues to struggle to ensure recognition of our chartered engineers in a Europe nearly entirely committed to five years of higher education for professional engineers, and against a wider international scene where four years is widely considered to be the minimum requirement.

Civil engineering design and management is a widely traded service, and the success of the UK in international markets and projects depends on the widespread acceptance of credentials of our engineers.

Andrew Ramsay, executive director, Engineering Council (UK), 10 Maltravers Street, London WC2R 3ER

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.