Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Standard bug bearer

Letters: Readers write

I refer to the article entitled 'Litigation fears stifle geotechnical innovation' (NCE last week). Screwfast Foundations has spent an enormous amount of time over the past few years trying to get acceptance of our system.

The system was invented in 1833 and many Victorian structures are still supported by it. The Americans developed a similar system that is widely used in the USA and the Australians also carried out further research in the 1970s and 1980s. We have sponsored independent research at The Transport Research Laboratory.

When used in the right context the system can save British industry millions of pounds. Unfortunately this counts for nothing when there is no British Standard to refer to. Very few of those who have responsibility for 'approval' have the guts to say 'yes' without such a standard.

I asked the relevant committee of BS how this might be rectified and was told that I was seeking a commercial advantage. I was told I had to speak to the French. The French said I would have to gain the support of five other EU countries before they would even consider it.

Peter Dunn, chairman, Screwfast Foundations,

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.