Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Stadium of blight

Letters

The continuing fiasco over the rebuilding of Wembley Stadium prompts me to write to you. I believe the present proposals are over ambitious and totally inappropriate for the location.

It may well be that the existing facilities and safety measures are now inadequate when viewed by modern standards, so something has to be done. But I believe the grand schemes drawn up so far are unrealistic.

It has been claimed it is too late to change the plans because planning permission has been granted on the present scheme. This is a nonsense. It would not be the first time that plans have been changed and it would not be the last time.

Pushing ahead with that excuse in the face of financial uncertainty would be pig headed in the extreme.

Since the provision of a running track has already been ruled out, the appropriate solution for Wembley would be to refurbish the terraces and other facilities to modern standards.

Altering the basic fabric and external appearance seems unnecessary and uneconomic.

If the capacity of the venue is not significantly increased then Wembley would not have to finance improvements to local transport links - not an insignificant matter. And the twin towers could remain!

John Rastall www. interfleettechnology. com

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.