Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Southern comes to Seaford defence

LETTERS

I read with interest the article by Andrew Mylius on the Environment Agency's new approach to coastal flood defence at Pevensey, East Sussex (NCE 24 January).

Just along the coast, Southern Water Authority completed the similar Seaford sea defence scheme in the late 1980s (NCE 20 August 1987).

Seaford is directly exposed to the westerly winds and Atlantic swell running up the Channel. The threat of flooding to property in the low lying areas behind the sea wall prompted Southern Water to act.

In conjunction with the Hydraulics Research laboratories at Wallingford, it came up with scheme to form a 2.5km long, gently sloping beach in front of the battered Victorian sea wall.

Dutch dredging contractor Zanen Verstoep used a suction dredger in a round the clock operation to collect about 1.5M. m 3of shingle 24km off Littlehampton. The vessel had to stand well offshore at low tide and pump each 7,000m 3load onshore through a 1,000m long pipeline.

The material was so abrasive that the casings and impellers from the two electrically driven pumps had to be changed every two to three weeks, instead of the normal two to three years, and cost the contractor £50,000 a time.

Rodney Byles, 9 Bracken Close, Farnham Common, Bucks SL2 3JP

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.