Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

South east England aviation consultation delayed

A consultation on expanding airports in south-east England has been delayed again amid reports of tensions within the coalition over the issue.

The consultation had been due to be announced this month but is now unlikely to go ahead until the autumn.

The Liberal Democrats are opposed to expansion, and the coalition agreement rules out new airports in the region. But many Conservative MPs are pushnig for a third runway at Heathrow.

London mayor Boris Johnson also opposes a third runway at Heathrow and instead backs construction of a controversial new airport in the Thames Estuary.

The ICE said the delay was “frustrating”.

“The ongoing delay in addressing our hub capacity issues is disappointing and only adds to the frustration and uncertainty,” said ICE director general Nick Baveystock. “When it comes to the UK’s airport infrastructure needs, there are some tough political and public choices, but the UK’s reputation is on the line.

“We must ensure there is sufficient capacity to improve connectivity and maintain our competitiveness. Hopefully the autumn consultation will put all options on the table for consideration, so we can secure the best outcome for the environment, society and the economy.”

 The ICE will be responding to the consultation through an expert panel and on completion of that Panel’s work will make our findings public and transparent.

Another aviation paper dealing with noise, emissions and regional airports will be published today.


Readers' comments (1)

  • Get Nick Clegg and his peurile party out of the way before the wags the dog to death. In 2010 David Cameron should have gone back to the electorate from whom he would have received a mandate. The palace of Westminster is bad enough at its best but anything which requires teamwork and collaboration is doomed. What a way to run (down) a country.
    Jim Barrack

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.