Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Soft Center


Even after the third anniversary of the collapse of the World Trade Center in the New York, the causes of the disaster are still being examined and discussed.

Almost 40 years ago, in August 1968, a public inquiry into the collapse of part of Ronan Point in London concluded that a local gas explosion in one room had triggered an incident that affected the whole height of one corner of the building.

The block was found to be structurally vulnerable to a socalled 'domino' effect. It had been 'system-built' and the local incident had triggered a catastrophic event.

As a result new legislation was introduced in Britain in order to limit the structural damage that could be caused by a major local incident and buildings throughout the country were re-assessed and strengthened where necessary.

While many European countries quickly adopted similar building standards they were largely ignored in the USA for many years and thus the World Trade Center (built in 1972), did not comply with similar legislation. The centre was thus a 'vulnerable' building from the day it was first occupied.

Even today, this fact has never been acknowledged by the various US inquiries into the disaster.

David Evans, 46 Laytons Lane, Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex, TW16 6LR.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.