Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Six-metre beam strikes worker after falling from London hotel job

Two contractors have been sentenced after a six-metre metal beam fell from the sixth floor of a building, striking and injuring a worker on a third floor scaffold, before crashing onto a busy street in the City of London.

The 32kg beam hit a 38-year-old building worker while he was on an access platform, breaking six ribs and fracturing three vertebrae. The man, a self-employed sub-contractor, was in hospital for a week and unable to work for two months.

He was working on the construction of the seven-storey South Place Hotel in Wilson Street, EC2, when the incident happened on 5 October 2011.

McClaren Construction was the principal contractor and John Doyle Construction, which is now in liquidation, was a sub-contractor.

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE), which investigated, prosecuted both companies for safety breaches and both were sentenced at Southwark Crown Court.

The court was told that several John Doyle workers were dismantling the temporary structural framework on the sixth floor of the building when they lost control of the six-metre beam. It fell down the side of the building and hit the worker, who was on a mobile work platform three storeys below, and then landed in Wilson Street, a busy public highway on one side of the site.

HSE found that John Doyle Construction failed to identify and implement reasonable control measures that should have been in place to prevent any beam from falling in that way. McClaren Construction approved their sub-contractor’s work method statement and also did not identify that controls were lacking.

In addition, neither company took any steps to make sure that no one was working below the areas where the framework structure was being dismantled.

John Doyle was fined a nominal £1 with no order for costs after being found guilty of a breach of Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. The court indicated that had the firm not been in liquidation, a £50,000 fine would have been imposed.

McClaren was fined £22,500 with £14,854 in costs after admitting a similar breach of the same Act.

HSE inspector Eileen Gascoigne said: “What happened at the building site that day had the potential to kill one or more workers and members of the public passing close by. It was entirely good fortune that the consequences were not even graver.

“The incident was entirely preventable. The risks were foreseeable and the measures that needed to be in place are well-known in the industry and were readily implemented afterwards.

“As an experienced principal contractor, McClaren failed to properly check the controls that John Doyle proposed for the work, and failed to implement their own procedures for ensuring there was no risk to either other contractors, or members of the public, from the work taking place.

“John Doyle was also an experienced contractor and yet it too failed on an important safety issue.”   

Readers' comments (1)

  • There is no mention of what action was taken against the workers carrying out the dismantling. Surely they have a responsibility to ensure that they are carrying out the work in a reasonably practicable manner. It appears to me that judgements like this, with no reference to the responsibilities of the individual, are giving the impression that no matter how negligent the worker is, when it comes down to HSE punishment, it will only be the company employing the worker who will be held to blame. Companies can train operatives until they are blue in the face, but if the operative does not accept any responsibility for their own and others safety, why should it only be the company who is punished.
    D C Donald

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.

Related Jobs