Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Signs of weakness

Letters

A considerable amount of money has been invested in the variable message signs project on the M6 between Birmingham and Warrington, and in other places across the country.

Never has a project been better named. 'Variable' appears to apply not just to the content of the message, but also its quality.

Examples include: 'Caution spray risk' northbound on the M6 near Crewe, 36 hours after the last rain and 'Queue ahead' approaching the M62/M6 junction - but I've got a choice of three routes, and if I knew just a bit more detail, I could probably take avoiding action.

It is a good system, but it's not being properly managed and exploited. I've heard that the police may be reluctant to use it for fear of directing traffic onto other roads, but if this is the case, why was it installed?

By contrast, the Scottish system, which extends from Abington on the M74 to north of Perth on the A9, and across the Central Belt from West to East is normally very reliable, active, and above all useful.

David Gartside (M), 19 The Mount, Congleton, Cheshire CW12 4FD

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.