Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Shortlist no short cut

Letters

I refer to your letter from Christopher Vickers entitled 'Cut costs by joining Constructionline' (NCE 4 May).

Quite clearly, Mr Vickers has never attempted, as a client, to obtain a shortlist of tenderers for a mediumsized project using Constructionline. It grinds extremely slowly. Furthermore, the shortest list I have ever managed to produce contained the names of 92 firms.

In order to view the firms, one then has to call them up 20 at a time with each batch taking several minutes to surface. The more firms that register with Constuctionline the longer such lists will become and the more tedious and long-winded the operation. Sadly, I find it difficult to envisage any logical way of reducing the lists.

I can see only one sensible use for Constructionline in avoiding the necessity for firms to prequalify in order to be added to clients own inhouse lists. Forget about using it to produce project specific short lists - it does not and cannot work.

Peter Simmonds, design and programming manager, County Property Services, Northampton County Council, PO Box 128, County Hall, Northampton NN1 1AS

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Please note comments made online may also be published in the print edition of New Civil Engineer. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.